Peer review / Visible rigour

A trust layer readers can examine.

Equors makes review structured, version-aware and transparent—while protecting reviewer independence and confidential material.

Open reviewer demo

Review standard

Four principles govern every decision.

Claims match evidence.

Reviewers assess whether methods, data and limitations support the conclusions actually presented.

Conflicts are explicit.

Identity, affiliation, funding and competing-interest checks occur before access to the record.

Versions remain connected.

Every decision, response and revision is attached to the exact manuscript version reviewed.

Transparency has boundaries.

Public review records are separated from confidential notes, protected data and identity choices.

From intake to verified record

The complete review workflow.

Integrity screen

Scope, authorship, ethics, files, data access and declarations.

Editor triage

Contribution, evidence readiness and reviewer profile.

Reviewer match

Expertise graph, availability and conflict exclusions.

Structured review

Criteria, evidence-linked comments and recommendation.

Revision matrix

Author responses mapped to comments and manuscript changes.

Verified record

Decision, review history and publishable transparency layer.

Role-aware workflows

One record. Different responsibilities.

Authors

Respond to the record, not a disconnected document.

Guided completeness and integrity checks
Point-by-point revision matrix
Version comparison and tracked evidence changes
Data, code and access-condition publishing

Reviewers

Focus judgement where it matters.

Conflict checks before manuscript access
Structured criteria with evidence-linked comments
Autosaved private and author-facing notes
Clear recommendation and confidence statement

Editors

Control quality without losing context.

Decision queues and reviewer assignment
Completeness, ethics and method checkpoints
Response-matrix comparison
Service-level and quality analytics

Readers

See how confidence was earned.

Review timeline and decision rationale
Version history and change summaries
Methods, datasets and limitations
Clear separation of evidence and interpretation

Ethics & safeguards

Open where useful. Protected where necessary.

Transparency never overrides consent, reviewer safety, confidential data, legal restrictions or responsible disclosure.

Conflict intelligence

Affiliation, co-authorship and declared-interest checks support human editorial judgement.

Identity choice

Reviewers may sign public reports or remain anonymous according to policy and risk.

Protected evidence

Restricted data can be described and verified without being publicly exposed.

Appeals record

Appeals are handled by an independent editor with a complete decision trail.